Now its the turn of Sikkim…

10:50 pm Geopolitics, India, Indian Foreign Policy, Indian States, Media, National Security, PRC, Tibet

A little under two years ago on July 6, 2006, the Nathu-La Pass situated on the border between India and now illegally occupied Tibet was opened for border trade between the Indian state of Sikkim and the so called Tibetan Autonomous region.

At that time much of the media and officialdom had gone on an overdrive peddling the line that this was being done because China had finally recognised Sikkim as an integral part of India, in exchange for the India’s unequivocal recognition of Tibet as a part of China.

But since then though countless Indian officials, mediamen and politicians cutting across party lines have many times chanted the mantra that India recognises Tibet as an integral part of China without the slightest provocation, no Chinese leader has ever made a similar statement on Sikkim even when asked pointed questions in that regard. The closest that they ever came was when Chinese premier Wen Jiabao in his April 2005 visit to India in reply to a pointed question tactfully replied “It is well known that the issue of Sikkim is no longer the problem between China and India. This is the common consensus reached by the leaders of both countries.”

The Indian side unfortunately did not push this matter forcefully enough with the Chinese side and extract a unambiguous written statement from the Chinese declaring that they accepted that Sikkim was an integral part of India and chose to be content with the Chinese statement that “Sikkim was no longer a problem between China and India”.

Well now they have decided to make it a problem. A year after they demolished a makeshift bunker on the Indian side comes the news that they have now laid claim to a piece of land in North Sikkim.

China has surprised India by laying claim on a small tract of land in North Sikkim, even threatening this week to demolish existing stone structures there. India has strongly rebutted these claims, lodged an official protest and barred Chinese troops from entering the area.

Referred to as the “Finger Area” by Indian armed forces, this territory falls north of Gyangyong in Sikkim and overlooks a strategically important valley known as the Sora Funnel. It contains several stone cairns, which are essentially heaps of stones that can be used for shelter. The area is in the northernmost tip of Sikkim, north of a place called Gyangyong, and appears like a protruding finger on the map — hence the name Finger Area.[link]

The bottomline is that the Indian side brought this upon itself by not extracting a written and unambiguous statement from the Chinese side that they regarded Sikkim as an integral part of India and lulling themselves into complacency. The Media is not entirely blameless in this episode as it had back then shirked its duty of playing the role of a vigilant watchdog and allowed itself to be taken in by the government line that the absence of an unambiguous statement from the Chinese side was not a big deal at all. so this despairing statement at the end of the article in the Indian express appears quite disingenuous.

But clearly, what was considered a settled issue once China recognized Sikkim as part of India is now making an uncomfortable re-entry into the boundary settlement discourse.

can we hear that collective refrain from the Indian establishment and the media- oh! the wicked Chinese not respecting the “spirit” of that “settlement” .

got news for you guys with Communist China even the letter doesn’t matter. but it would have atleast made you guys look less stupid now if you had only managed to get it.

8 Responses
  1. Mihir :

    Date: May 20, 2008 @ 4:48 pm

    India has … barred Chinese troops from entering the area

    As opposed to earlier, when Chinese troops were freely allowed to enter Indian territory?

    How spineless can a nation be?

  2. Apollo :

    Date: May 20, 2008 @ 9:31 pm

    As opposed to earlier, when Chinese troops were freely allowed to enter Indian territory?

    u mean to say that India at any point of time earlier was allowing Chinese troops to freely enter Indian territory? will any sovereign country allow such a thing as allowing foreign soldiers run amok in its territory without challenging them?

    it’s a gud idea for u to consider thinking a little and actually reading the article in question in full before typing. :)

  3. Mihir :

    Date: May 21, 2008 @ 7:21 am

    *sigh* That article makes it appear that Chinese troops did cross over unchallenged. And the Chinese allegedly demolished an Indian bunker, didn’t they? I wonder how they were challenged.

    As for typing before thinking, we shall leave that to experts like yourself, no? :P

  4. Apollo :

    Date: May 21, 2008 @ 9:41 pm

    Mihir,

    well the burden of proof is on you to prove that India never before challenged or even protested chinese intrusions on its territory before this particular incident.

    and what is this nonsense about banning chinese soldiers from entering Indian territory? maybe the concerned journalist who filed that article didn’t do some proofreading or maybe didn’t question the foreign ministry spokesman who made such a statement.

    according to international law the territory of a country is out of bounds for all foreginers who have to seek the permission from that country’s govt to enter. so the chinese in this case must have been by default forbidden from trespassing without permission.

    in the meanwhile let me remind that this article concerns itself with the topic of why suddenly sikkim has become a bone of contention when the matter was supposed to have been settled by now.

  5. Mihir :

    Date: May 22, 2008 @ 6:53 pm

    Dude, I never claimed that Chinese troops were allowed to enter Indian territory. I just said that the article makes it appear so. I don’t see why I have to prove that.

    Also, I find it disturbing that India had to “bar Chinese troops from entering the area”. Perhaps this statement was worded wrong, but it makes one wonder what India’s policy about Chinese troops in the area was till date.

    As for the article itself, I fully agree with your views. The first post was just my humble two paise.

  6. Apollo :

    Date: May 22, 2008 @ 11:11 pm

    Mihir,

    i’am sorry. i think there has been a confusion. i should have read u r first comment properly before typing :).

  7. Mihir :

    Date: May 23, 2008 @ 3:23 am

    Ditto for my comments in post#3

    :-)

  8. » Blackmail the Weak, But respect the Strong | INI Signal :

    Date: June 1, 2008 @ 8:31 am

    [...] Roy, a recently retired senior Indian Government Civil Servant holds forth on India’s weak-kneed foreign policy on China and how this has has seriously harmed [...]

Leave a Comment

Your comment

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.